9/11: Ways in which factual evidence contradicts the official story

The 9/11 Consensus Points

Factual Evidence Contradicts the 9/11 Story

The official account of the events of September 11, 2001, has been used:

to justify the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, which have resulted in the deaths of millions of people;
to authorize torture, military tribunals, and extraordinary rendition; and
to suspend freedoms guaranteed by the American Constitution such as habeas corpus in the USA, and similar freedoms in Canada, the UK, and other countries.
The official claims regarding 9/11 are contradicted by facts that have been validated by a scientific consensus process, and which include the following points of “best evidence”.

The 28 Consensus Points are divided into the nine categories below, which in turn link to the individual 28 points:

*Sections H and V are NEW as of SEPTEMBER 2012*

A. General Consensus Points
B. Consensus Points about the Twin Towers
C. Consensus Points about the Collapse of World Trade Center 7
D. Consensus Points about the Pentagon
E. Consensus Points about the 9/11 Flights
F. Consensus Points about US Military Exercises On and Before 9/11
G. Consensus Points about the Political and Military Commands on 9/11
H. Consensus Points about Hijackers on 9/11
V. Consensus Points about Official Video Exhibits Regarding 9/11

A. General Consensus Points

Point G-1: A Claim Regarding Osama bin Laden (formerly Point 1, posted Sept. 2011)

Point G-2: A Claim that there was No Insider Trading in Put Options before September 11, 2001 (formerly Point 3A, posted Jan. 2012)

B. Consensus Points about the Twin Towers

Point TT-1: A Claim about the Destruction of the Twin Towers: Impact, Jet Fuel, and Fire Only (formerly Point 2, posted Sept. 2011)

Point TT-2: A Claim about the Destruction of the Twin Towers: Impact, Fire, and Gravity Only (formerly Point 3, posted Sept. 2011)

Point TT-3: A Claim Excluding Explosions in the Twin Towers (formerly Point 4, posted Sept. 2011)

Point TT-4: A Second Claim Excluding Explosives in the Twin Towers (formerly Point 5, posted Sept. 2011)

Point TT-5: The Claim that the World Trade Center Dust Contained No Thermitic Materials (formerly Point 9, posted Sept. 2011)

C. Consensus Points about the Collapse of World Trade Center 7

Point WTC7-1: The Claim that WTC 7 Collapsed from Fire Alone (formerly Point 6, posted Sept. 2011)

Point WTC7-2: The Claim in NIST’s Draft Report that WTC 7 Did Not Come Down at Free Fall Acceleration (formerly Point 7, posted Sept. 2011)

Point WTC7-3: The Claim in NIST’s Final Report that WTC 7 Came Down in Free Fall Without Explosives (formerly Point 8, posted Sept. 2011)

D. Consensus Points about the Pentagon

Point Pent-1: Why the Attack on the Pentagon Was Not Prevented: The First Official Account (formerly Point 4A, posted Jan. 2012)

Point Pent-2: Why the Attack on the Pentagon Was Not Prevented: The Second Official Account (formerly Point 5A, posted Jan. 2012)

Point Pent-3: The Claim Regarding Hani Hanjour as Flight 77 Pilot (formerly Point 12, posted Sept. 2011)

E. Consensus Points about the 9/11 Flights

Point Flt-1: A Claim Regarding Hijacked Passenger Jets (formerly Point 10, posted Sept. 2011)

Point Flt-2: The Claim that Flight 93 Crashed Near Shanksville, Pennsylvania (formerly Point 11, posted Sept. 2011)

F. Consensus Points about US Military Exercises On and Before 9/11

Point ME-1: Did Military Exercises Show that the Military was Prepared for Domestic (as Well as Foreign) Hijackings? JUNE 2012

Point ME-2: The Claim that the Military Exercises Did Not Delay the Response to the 9/11 Attacks JUNE 2012

G. Consensus Points about the Political and Military Commands on 9/11

Point MC-Intro: Overview of Contradicted Claims about Key Military and Political Leaders JUNE 2012

Point MC-1: Why Was President Bush Not Hustled Away from the Florida School? (formerly Point 1A, posted Jan. 2012)

Point MC-2: The White House Claim as to How Long: President Bush Remained in the Florida Classroom (formerly Point 2A, posted Jan. 2012)

Point MC-3: The Claim about the Time of Dick Cheney’s Entry into the White House Bunker (formerly Point 13, posted Sept. 2011)

Point MC-4: When Did Cheney Authorize the Shoot-down of Civilian Planes? JUNE 2012

Point MC-5: Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld’s Behavior between 9:00 and 10:00 AM JUNE 2012

Point MC-6: T he Activities of General Richard Myers during the 9/11 Attacks JUNE 2012

Point MC-7: The Time of General Shelton’s Return to his Command JUNE 2012

Point MC-8: The Activities of Brigadier General Montague Winfield between 8:30 and 10:30 AM JUNE 2012

H. Consensus Points about Hijackers on 9/11

Point H-1: Mohamed Atta’s Mysterious Trip to Portland NEW, SEPTEMBER 2012

V. Consensus Points about Official Video Exhibits Regarding 9/11

Point Video-1: The Alleged Security Videos of Mohamed Atta during a Mysterious Trip to Portland, Maine, September 10-11, 2001 NEW, SEPTEMBER 2012

Point Video-2: Was the Airport Video of the Alleged AA 77 Hijackers Authentic? Official 9/11 Videotaped Evidence NEW, SEPTEMBER 2012

Source and links

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s